• Home
  • The Clinic
  • Martin Haskell
  • Other Locations
  • News
  • Find Help
  • Archives
  • About

Abortion in Cincinnati

 

Pro-life advocate criminally charged for speaking to woman outside abortion facility

7/21/2014

0 Comments

 
Pro-life advocate criminally charged for speaking to woman outside abortion facility in Colorado
WASHINGTON - Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court Friday on behalf of pro-life advocates opposed to a Colorado law that has been used to prohibit speech on public sidewalks outside abortion facilities. On June 26, the high court unanimously upheld the right of Americans to engage in free speech on public sidewalks in front of abortion businesses in the case of McCullen v. Coakley.

“Coloradans should be free to speak peacefully with whomever they please on public sidewalks without fear of criminal prosecution,” said ADF Senior Counsel Michael J. Norton. “That includes peaceful pro-life advocates who just want to offer information and help to mothers who would like it. The Supreme Court recently affirmed this freedom, an essential part of American life since the nation’s founding.”

The vaguely worded Colorado law makes it a crime to “knowingly obstruct, detain, hinder, impede, or block another person’s entry to or exit from a health care facility.” In April 2010, Jo Ann Scott was criminally charged for violating the law even though she simply spoke to a woman for 26 seconds on a Denver public street that was more than 100 feet from the entrance of an abortion facility.

ADF filed the brief in Scott v. People of the State of Colorado on behalf of 40 Days for Life, Sidewalk Advocates for Life, Abby Johnson, and Leila Jeanne Hill, the plaintiff in a prior Supreme Court anti-speech zone case, Hill v. Colorado.

As the ADF brief explains, “The Colorado statute violates the U.S. Constitution” and “fails to define essential terms and provides no notice as to what conduct or speech is prohibited. The statute also permits unfettered discretion and selective prosecution and punishment.”

The brief further explains that “McCullen clarifies that there is no right to be protected from ‘uncomfortable’ speech on public streets and sidewalks. The Court, in acknowledging that streets and sidewalks occupy a ‘special position in terms of First Amendment protection because of their historic role as sites for discussion and debate,’ noted that… when an individual is on a public street or sidewalk, a ‘listener often encounters speech he might otherwise tune out.’”

“The vagueness of Colorado’s law led to censorship that cannot survive constitutional scrutiny,” added ADF Litigation Counsel Natalie Decker. “There is no sound legal basis for creating zones on public sidewalks where peaceful, constitutionally protected speech is banned.”

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    What's happening now with the Women's Med Center abortion clinics in Cincinnati, Dayton and Indianapolis?

    Find that and other life news stories here.


    Updates on the abortion clinic in Cincinnati

    Archives

    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    April 2013
    August 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011

    Categories

    All
    40 Days For Life
    Abortion
    Adoption
    Alabama
    California
    Cincinnati
    Cleveland
    Columbus
    Dayton
    Elections
    Free Speech
    Huntsville
    Indianapolis
    Legal
    Media
    Ohio
    Politics
    Safety
    Sharonville
    South Dakota

    RSS Feed


    ProLifeBlogs





Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.